lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081215231502.GC12431@fluff.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:15:02 +0000
From:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: driver probe error reporting

This runs on from the discussion in [1] on how drivers (especially
one using a variant of the device driver framework) report errors
on probe. There are two main classes of errors, the type which happen
at probe time (device not responding, not enough memory, etc) and
errors that are due to configuration such as missing device configuration
data.

It has been suggested that using dev_err() to report any configuration
data error is a bloat of code as a properly debugged kernel should never
find itself in this state.

Unfortunatley the only diagnostic dev_xxx() macro is dev_dbg() which is
only available if the the driver code itself defines DEBUG. I would think
it would be better to have a macro that can be turned on/off by a kernel
configuration for when debugging which turns on the messages that are
important to developers creating new machine/arch support but disabled
for shipping kernels.

Basically, what are people's thoughts on a "Verbose probe error"
configuration option in the "Kernel hacking" submenu with its own
dev_probe_err() or similar macro?


[1] http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/ce6260537381dd94/7ed3f699db907357?show_docid=7ed3f699db907357

-- 
Ben (ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ