[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1229329100.14605.13.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:18:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Collier-Brown <davecb@....com>,
Tim Connors <tconnors@...ro.swin.edu.au>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/7] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 01:38 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> I am open to suggestion on any interesting workload that should be
> tested. I have tested ebizzy and SPECjbb for power savings.
Try some of the typical fortran stuff like lapack?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists