[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081215101524.GA12431@fluff.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:15:25 +0000
From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPIO: Fix probe() error return in gpio driver probes
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 04:11:17PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Sunday 14 December 2008, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > Has anyone reveiwed this patch? Are there any comments, or can this
> > be commited at somepoint (even if it is during the next merge window)?
>
> I was thinking that -EINVAL is almost the least informative
> diagnostic code possible, since so many places return it
> that it's usually hard to find out *which* invalid parameter
> triggered ...
>
> Is there a less-overloaded code you could return?
The only other ones that I think would be close are:
ENOTSUP Operation not supported (POSIX.1)
EPROTO Protocol error (POSIX.1)
ENOENT No such file or directory
EFAULT Bad address
Feedback welcone.
> I have no issue with the patch other than that.
>
> - Dave
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Ben (ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists