[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812151033060.16370@blonde.anvils>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:34:26 +0000 (GMT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH mmotm] memcg fix swap accounting leak (v3)
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> Fix swapin charge operation of memcg.
>
> @@ -1139,10 +1139,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_commit_charge_swapin(str
> /*
> * Now swap is on-memory. This means this page may be
> * counted both as mem and swap....double count.
> - * Fix it by uncharging from memsw. This SwapCache is stable
> - * because we're still under lock_page().
> + * Fix it by uncharging from memsw. Basically, this SwapCache is stable
> + * under lock_page(). But in do_swap_page()::memory.c, reuse_swap_page()
> + * may call delete_from_swap_cache() before reach here.
> */
> - if (do_swap_account) {
> + if (do_swap_account && PageSwapCache(page)) {
> swp_entry_t ent = {.val = page_private(page)};
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> memcg = swap_cgroup_record(ent, NULL);
Yes, that addition looks good to me.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists