[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9def9db0812160001x49f2a8c7udb11f35f6e1a27c9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:01:51 +0100
From: "Markus Rechberger" <mrechberger@...il.com>
To: "Németh Márton" <nm127@...email.hu>
Cc: mschimek@....at, video4linux-list@...hat.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, em28xx@...ntral.de
Subject: Re: [Em28xx] parameter of VIDIOC_G_INPUT and VIDIOC_S_INPUT?
Hi,
2008/12/16 Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu>:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about the parameter of VIDIOC_G_INPUT and VIDIOC_S_INPUT
> parameters in v4l2 specification.
>
> The "Video for Linux Two API Specification" text says that the
> parameter of VIDIOC_G_INPUT and VIDIOC_S_INPUT is ...
>
>> [...] a pointer to an integer where the driver stores the number
>> of the input, as in the struct v4l2_input index field.
>>
>> http://v4l2spec.bytesex.org/spec/r11217.htm
>
> In the v4l2_input structure the index has the type of __u32.
>
> In contrast, in <linux/videodev2.h> (as of 2.6.27) the ioctls are defined
> as follows:
>
>> #define VIDIOC_G_INPUT _IOR('V', 38, int)
>> #define VIDIOC_S_INPUT _IOWR('V', 39, int)
>
> The problem is that '__u32' is unsigned and 'int' is signed. Furthermore
> one cannot be sure that sizeof(__u32) == sizeof(int) on all platforms.
>
> I guess that the parameter of VIDIOC_G_INPUT and VIDIOC_S_INPUT should be
> a pointer to __u32. What do you think?
>
seems to be sane yes. This ioctl is also handled in compat_ioctl32.c and might
also get some attention there.
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists