[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081216170635.DBB8.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:08:43 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
Applied after: linux-next.patch
==
Subject: [mmotm][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
commit 08678b0841267c1d00d771fe01548d86043d065e introduced
irq_desc_lock_class variable.
But it is used only if CONFIG_LOCKDEP=Y.
otherwise, following warnings happend.
CC kernel/irq/handle.o
kernel/irq/handle.c:26: warning: 'irq_desc_lock_class' defined but not used
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/irq/handle.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: b/kernel/irq/handle.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -20,10 +20,12 @@
#include "internals.h"
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
/*
* lockdep: we want to handle all irq_desc locks as a single lock-class:
*/
static struct lock_class_key irq_desc_lock_class;
+#endif
/**
* handle_bad_irq - handle spurious and unhandled irqs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists