[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b040c32a0812160032pf681f13s9e5e86c4b5448012@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:32:21 -0800
From: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch] x86: convert rdtscll() to use __native_read_tsc
Is there any reason why x86 rdtscll have to use the out of line
function instead of inline __native_read_tsc()? native_read_tsc and
__native_read_tsc is essentially the same functions.
Patch to let x86 rdtscll() to use the inline version of read_tsc.
Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index c2a812e..42f639b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -181,10 +181,10 @@ static inline int rdmsrl_amd_safe
}
#define rdtscl(low) \
- ((low) = (u32)native_read_tsc())
+ ((low) = (u32)__native_read_tsc())
#define rdtscll(val) \
- ((val) = native_read_tsc())
+ ((val) = __native_read_tsc())
#define rdpmc(counter, low, high) \
do { \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists