linux-kernel - Re: Impact: (was Re: [PATCH] update rwlock initialization for nat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081216111501.GH14518@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:15:01 -0200
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dada1@...mosbay.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Impact: (was Re: [PATCH] update rwlock initialization for
	nat_table)

Em Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 05:19:35PM -0800, Andrew Morton escreveu:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:10:39 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> > Speaking of Impact: lines, is this a new fashion or what?
> > 
> > Looking at the ones which are already in official tree, they are either
> > trivially duplicating Subject: line, or effectively duplicating Subject: line,
> > or cover up for insufficiently informative (read: badly written) Subject: line,
> > or simply useless.
> > 
> > 
> > 	Subject: sched: CPU remove deadlock fix
> > 	Impact: fix possible deadlock in CPU hot-remove path
> > 
> > What prevented to write "Subject: sched: fix possible deadlock in CPU hot-remove path"?
> > 
> > 
> > 	AMD IOMMU: __unmap_single: check for bad_dma_address instead of 0
> > 	Impact: minor fix
> > 
> > Well...
> > 
> > I have an idea on how to make them remotely useful, but can we agree that there is
> > a problem arising here?
> 
> heh, I must say that the ones I've seen haven't been very useful.
> 
> However...  Given the amount of time I (and others, to a lesser extent)
> spend complaining about and scratching heads over crappy changelogs, we
> would benefit from having a standard changelog template.
> 
> Something which guides people to creating a good changelog.  But it
> would have to be short, and carefully written.  It should learn from
> history, to wit:
> 
> - ./REPORTING-BUGS has a template and afaik it has never elicited any
>   useful information.
> 
> - Documentation/SubmittingPatches has info on how to write a
>   changelog, and people blithely ignore it.
> 
> - kerneldoc provide a template of sorts, and we see that filling out
>   templates puts people's brains into "filling out a template" mode,
>   rather than into "communicating information" mode.
> 
> An interesting problem.

Well, if git commit could add that template in addition to the
Signed-off-by line, that could be a start, perhaps as a new option and
then it would get it from .git/changelog-template, that would be
provided by each project.

/me scratches head...

    -t, --template <FILE>
                              use specified template file

Its there already, but then perhaps what is needed is a _default_
template.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/