lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:45:14 +0900
From:	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP

>> > actually, this breaks the build on !SPARSEIRQ because we will use that
>> > class in the non-sparseirq case. So we've converted a build warning to
>> > a build failure ;-)
>>
>> Please give me your .config and tell me your arch. my ia64 box (ia64 is
>> !SPARSEIRQ) can build the akpm patch.
>
> The expected build failure is obvious from reading the code:
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
>  void early_init_irq_lock_class(void)
>  {
>  #ifndef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
>         struct irq_desc *desc;
>         int i;
>
>         for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
>                 if (!desc)
>                         continue;
>
>                 lockdep_set_class(&desc->lock, &irq_desc_lock_class);
>
> Note that it's an #ifndef sparseirq, not an #ifdef sparseirq condition.

I see. thanks.
It seems my first proposal is better.

or, following #ifdef ?

#if defined(CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ) || defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS)

 /*
 * lockdep: we want to handle all irq_desc locks as a single lock-class:
 */
 static struct lock_class_key irq_desc_lock_class;

#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ