[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081216152416.GB23859@cff.thadambail>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:54:17 +0530
From: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@...nmoko.org>
To: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Green <andy@...nmoko.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] power_supply: PCF50633 battery charger driver
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:38:11AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Hello Balaji,
>
> It's great to see OpenMoko patches submitted, much thanks
> for your work!
>
Hi Anton,
You are welcome!
> > +
> > + /* Set up IRQ handlers */
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mbc_irq_handlers); i++)
> > + pcf->irq_handler[mbc_irq_handlers[i]] =
> > + pcf50633_mbc_irq_handler;
>
> Ugh. Is there any particular reason why you don't implement a
> chained interrupt controller in the PCF core? (as in
> drivers/mfd/asic3.c, for example).
>
> That way you could do ordinary request_irq() for the MFD devices'
> interrupts.
>
> (I can only guess: you didn't make it because PCF is on the
> I2C bus, and it's just easier to handle devices via single
> workqueue in the core driver?)
>
Since we have a fixed number of irq consumers, it's much simpler doing
chained interrupts this way. Using an irq_chip is going to introduce
unnecessary complezity, I feel.
The V2, of the series (about to be sent) changes how irq managemt
is done - pcf50633_request_irq and pcf50633_free_irq are used.
Thank you for the review.
Will send a new version soon.
- Balaji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists