linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #12208] uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1LCbpI-0002MN-7R@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:27:12 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	efault@....de
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, rjw@...k.pl, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #12208] uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> We definitely don't want to do that.  Hm.  There are only two commits
> that spring to mind...
> 
> 1af5f730fc1bf7c62ec9fb2d307206e18bf40a69, which is another hope not, and

This didn't fix it either.

> 3f3a490480d8ab96e0fe30a41f80f14e6a0c579d which doesn't seem likely.

This can't be reverted on latest git.

Is there a way to trace what is happening in the scheduler?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/