linux-kernel - Re: time_is_after

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020812160813x692abe16t5148462a9036856d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:13:32 +0200
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	ptb@....it.uc3m.es
Cc:	hannes@...xchg.org, "linux kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: time_is_after_jiffies misnomer

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Peter T. Breuer <ptb@....it.uc3m.es> wrote:
> The kernel's
>
>     time_is_after_jiffies(500)
>
> macro mathematically means
>
>    the current value of the jiffies variable is LESS THAN 500

Not that you would ever do something like that. Instead, you will see
something like this if you grep the kernel sources a bit:

    time_is_after_jiffies(jiffies + 500)

                    Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/