linux-kernel - Re: suspend/resume fails on second attempt in LNXVIDEO:00

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:37:46 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	"Brian J. Murrell" <brian@...erlinx.bc.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: suspend/resume fails on second attempt in LNXVIDEO:00

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 of December 2008, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:25:37 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > > Because the hal-driven whitelist allows us to match systems in a more
> > > detailed way.  If your system is in the s2ram whitelist already and
> > > works with it, there shouldn't be any difference.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, Ubuntu in their "wisdom" removed s2ram and claim "s2both" 
> > supersedes it in that it does both suspend to disk and suspend to ram and 
> > then suspends, but if your battery dies while suspended you can still 
> > resume from the suspend to disk.

I seem to be missing the original message, but: no, s2ram doesn't exist 
in Ubuntu because pm-utils handles that role.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/