linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/10] x86: microcode_amd: fix wrong handling of equivalent CPU id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081216180747.GH7013@alberich.amd.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:07:47 +0100
From:	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/10] x86: microcode_amd: fix wrong handling of equivalent
	CPU id

mc_header->processor_rev_id is a 2 byte value. Similar is true for
equiv_cpu in an equiv_cpu_entry -- only 2 bytes are of interest.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c |   23 ++++++-----------------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
index 5f8e5d7..b5bc814 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct microcode_header_amd {
 	unsigned int  mc_patch_data_checksum;
 	unsigned int  nb_dev_id;
 	unsigned int  sb_dev_id;
-	unsigned char processor_rev_id[2];
+	u16 processor_rev_id;
 	unsigned char nb_rev_id;
 	unsigned char sb_rev_id;
 	unsigned char bios_api_rev;
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)
 
 	while (equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu != 0) {
 		if (current_cpu_id == equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu) {
-			equiv_cpu_id = equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu;
+			equiv_cpu_id = equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu & 0xffff;
 			break;
 		}
 		i++;
@@ -137,21 +137,10 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if ((mc_header->processor_rev_id[0]) != (equiv_cpu_id & 0xff)) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR
-			"microcode: CPU%d patch does not match "
-			"(patch is %x, cpu extended is %x) \n",
-			cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id[0],
-			(equiv_cpu_id & 0xff));
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	if ((mc_header->processor_rev_id[1]) != ((equiv_cpu_id >> 16) & 0xff)) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d patch does not match "
-			"(patch is %x, cpu base id is %x) \n",
-			cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id[1],
-			((equiv_cpu_id >> 16) & 0xff));
-
+	if (mc_header->processor_rev_id != equiv_cpu_id) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR	"microcode: CPU%d patch does not match "
+		       "(processor_rev_id: %x, eqiv_cpu_id: %x)\n",
+		       cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id, equiv_cpu_id);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-- 
1.6.0.4



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/