linux-kernel - Re: [rfc] x86, ptrace: memory accounting for branch tracing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081216101804.eccda780.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:18:04 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
	markus.t.metzger@...il.com, roland@...hat.com,
	eranian@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [rfc] x86, ptrace: memory accounting for branch tracing

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:30:59 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > Account memory allocated for the BTS buffer to the traced task's 
> > total_vm and locked_vm.
> 
> Andrew, is this the right (and preferred) way to attach BTS buffer 
> allocation overhead to the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK bucket:

Close.  I suspect we could refactor mlock.c to avoid all the code
duplication we have there.

There's (almost) nothing BTS-specific in this code, and it would be
better if it lived in mm/mlock.c.  Hopefully in a
usable-by-other-parts-of-mlock.c fashion.

> > +static int ptrace_bts_allocate_buffer(struct task_struct *child, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long rlim, vm, pgsz;
> > +	int error = -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	pgsz = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +
> > +	down_write(&child->mm->mmap_sem);
> > +
> > +	rlim = child->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_AS].rlim_cur >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +	vm   = child->mm->total_vm + pgsz;
> > +	if (rlim < vm)

This is off-by-one, I think.  Should be

	if (vm > rmlim)

> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	rlim = child->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +	vm   = child->mm->locked_vm + pgsz;
> > +	if (rlim < vm)

ditto

> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	child->bts_buffer = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!child->bts_buffer)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	child->bts_size = size;
> > +
> > +	child->mm->total_vm  += pgsz;
> > +	child->mm->locked_vm += pgsz;
> > +
> > +	error = 0;
> > + out:
> > +	up_write(&child->mm->mmap_sem);
> > +	return error;
> 
> ?
> 
> 	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/