linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] x86: Support always running TSC on Intel CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081216195505.GC4501@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:55:05 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86: Support always running TSC on Intel CPUs


* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:

> Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
>> hpa/Ingo,
>>
>> Haven't seen any comments on the patches here. Can you push it along in case there are no issues.
>>
>
> Hi Venki,
>
> Sorry about that -- I think you know what's up on my end :) Will look at 
> it as soon as I can.

okay - i queued it up in x86/tsc. It looked sane last time too, just the 
'NOSTOP_TSC' name sucked. I changed it to NONSTOP_TSC - hopefully we wont 
ever need a REALLY_NON_STOP_TSC distinction in the future ;-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/