[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081216203513.GA14787@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:35:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 14] swiotlb/x86: lay groundwork for xen dom0 use
of swiotlb
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Here's some patches to clean up swiotlb to prepare for some Xen dom0
> patches. These have been posted before, but undergone a round of
> cleanups to address various comments.
applied to tip/core/iommu, thanks Jeremy.
the only patch that seems to have the potential to break drivers is:
be4ac7b: swiotlb: consistently use address_needs_mapping everywhere
looks fine to me, but the gents on the Cc: might have a dissenting
opinion?
Ingo
------------->
>From be4ac7b87b27380bc43fa4f686e39b46eca2c866 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:17:28 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: consistently use address_needs_mapping everywhere
Impact: remove open-coded DMA mask assumptions
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
lib/swiotlb.c | 10 +++-------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
index db724ba..76821f0 100644
--- a/lib/swiotlb.c
+++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
@@ -465,13 +465,9 @@ swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
dma_addr_t dev_addr;
void *ret;
int order = get_order(size);
- u64 dma_mask = DMA_32BIT_MASK;
-
- if (hwdev && hwdev->coherent_dma_mask)
- dma_mask = hwdev->coherent_dma_mask;
ret = (void *)__get_free_pages(flags, order);
- if (ret && !is_buffer_dma_capable(dma_mask, virt_to_bus(ret), size)) {
+ if (ret && !address_needs_mapping(hwdev, virt_to_bus(ret), size)) {
/*
* The allocated memory isn't reachable by the device.
* Fall back on swiotlb_map_single().
@@ -495,9 +491,9 @@ swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
dev_addr = virt_to_bus(ret);
/* Confirm address can be DMA'd by device */
- if (!is_buffer_dma_capable(dma_mask, dev_addr, size)) {
+ if (!address_needs_mapping(hwdev, dev_addr, size)) {
printk("hwdev DMA mask = 0x%016Lx, dev_addr = 0x%016Lx\n",
- (unsigned long long)dma_mask,
+ (unsigned long long)dma_get_mask(hwdev),
(unsigned long long)dev_addr);
/* DMA_TO_DEVICE to avoid memcpy in unmap_single */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists