[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1229397927.5296.48.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:25:27 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #12208] uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 01:49 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208
> > Subject : uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host
> > Submitter : Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
> > Date : 2008-12-12 9:35 (2 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907463518593&w=4
>
> I did a bisection, and this is the commit which is responsible:
>
> commit 464b75273f64be7c81fee975bd6ca9593df3427b
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date: Fri Oct 24 11:06:15 2008 +0200
>
> sched: re-instate vruntime based wakeup preemption
>
> The advantage is that vruntime based wakeup preemption has a better
> conceptual model. Here wakeup_gran = 0 means: preempt when 'fair'.
> Therefore wakeup_gran is the granularity of unfairness we allow in order
> to make progress.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
If that commit is responsible, then it should also be very slow in pre
28 kernels, where the same exists. Hm, there's another possibility.
Can you try echo NO_LAST_BUDDY > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features?
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists