[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081216215033.GV14787@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:50:33 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/ftrace: use preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace
in ring_buffer_time_stamp()
* Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> 2008/12/16 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
> >
> > * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Impact: prevent a trace recursion
> >>
> >> After some tests with function graph tracer under x86-32, I saw some recursions
> >> caused by ring_buffer_time_stamp() that calls preempt_enable_no_notrace() which
> >> calls preempt_schedule() which is traced itself.
> >>
> >> This patch re-enables preemption without rescheduling.
> >>
> >> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > applied to tip/tracing/ftrace, thanks Frederic!
> >
> > Does this explain+fix the weird crashes/reboots you were seeing?
> >
> > Ingo
> >
>
> No, actually the functions tracers are protected against recursion,
> but rescheduling attempts
> during all trace insertions (and moreover a call to
> prepare_ftrace_return with cancelled insertion)
> is a useless payload.
>
> The hard reboots I've seen are related to x86-64 while
> disabling/reenabling a CPU through /sys/device/system/cpu No tracer was
> enabled at these times (the problem still remains with latest updates on
> -tip for half an hour).
>
> One other thing: I've seen these pointless calls to preempt_schedule
> while testing the function graph tracer on VirtualBox. Since it provides
> virtual serial lines, it was more easy to debug than usual (I haven't
> any serial line on my box). The function graph tracer hangs on
> VirtualBox with a x86-32 -tip. It seems that the tracing is too slow and
> so hrtimer_interrupt() does an eternal loop, assuming that a new time
> update has to be done (because too much time elapsed during th tracing)
> after each iteration. I'm not sure what to do...disabling tracing for
> hrtimers or....
reduce HZ?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists