[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081217072105.GA13408@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:21:05 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: Jike Song <albcamus@...il.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"achiang@...com" <achiang@...com>,
"bjorn.helgaas@...com" <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
"grundler@...isc-linux.org" <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, "matthew@....cx" <matthew@....cx>,
"randy.dunlap@...cle.com" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"rdreier@...co.com" <rdreier@...co.com>,
"horms@...ge.net.au" <horms@...ge.net.au>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13 v7] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:07:23PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:37:54AM +0800, Jike Song wrote:
>>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>>> Given a respin of 10-13 I think it's reasonable to merge this into
>>>> 2.6.29, but I'd be much happier about it if we got some driver code
>>>> along with it, so as not to have an unused interface sitting around for
>>>> who knows how many releases. Is that reasonable? Do you know if any of
>>>> the corresponding PF/VF driver bits are ready yet?
>>> Hi Jesse,
>>> Yu Zhao has posted a patch set with subject "SR-IOV driver example" at
>>> November 26, which illustrated the usage of SR-IOV API in Intel 82576
>>> VF/PF
>>> drivers;-)
>> Yes, but that driver was soundly rejected by the network driver
>> maintainers, so I wouldn't go around showing that as your primary
>> example of how to use this interface :)
>> The point is valid, I don't think these apis should go into the tree
>> without a driver or some other code using them. Otherwise they make no
>> sense at all to have in-tree.
>
> I agree the point is valid, but on another hand this is a 'the chicken &
> the egg' problem -- if we don't have the SR-IOV base, people who are
> developing PF drivers can not get their changes in-tree. Maybe they are
> holding the patches and waiting on the infrastructure... :-)
Are they? They can both go in at the same time, like almost every other
api addition to the kernel, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists