linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/15] sanitize audit_ipc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0812172047090.24405@tundra.namei.org>
Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:53:04 +1100 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
cc:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/15] sanitize audit_ipc_obj()

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Al Viro wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:24:40PM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Al Viro wrote:
> > 
> > > +		struct {
> > > +			uid_t			uid;
> > > +			gid_t			gid;
> > > +			mode_t			mode;
> > > +			u32			osid;
> > > +		} ipc;
> > 
> > 'osid' should be converted into 'secid' someday.
> 
> Eh?  Do you mean the field name there or the actual output?  Either is
> trivial, of course, but the latter is up to userland folks and the
> former alone seems to be rather pointless...

I was thinking in terms of the kernel API, where 'secid' is the preferred 
name for security identifiers ('sid' being an SELinux-specific term and 
also conflicting with 'session id').  Given that it's exposed to userland, 
I guess it's too late.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/