linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH last/many] x86: checking framework for correct use of ENTRY/PROC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081217144345.GA8078@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:43:45 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>
Cc:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH last/many] x86: checking framework for correct use of
	ENTRY/PROC

[Alexander van Heukelum - Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:04:50PM +0100]
...
| > Thanks Alexander!
| > 
| > You know I think you meant __ASSEMBLY__ while
| > were typing __ASSEMBLER__. Don't you? :)
| 
| If it matters there is some cleanup to do in the kernel tree ;).
| 
| Greetings,
|     Alexander
| 

I somehow missed the line the pointed to not apply this patch
that is why I was amaized since I dont remember where we use
__ASSEMBLER__. Got it :)

		- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/