linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081217183318.GG8078@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:33:18 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/many] PROC macro to annotate functions in assembly
	files

[Sam Ravnborg - Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 07:00:23PM +0100]
...
| > Sam, I think eventually we should get something like this:
| > 
| > - KPROBE will be eliminated and explicit section descriptions
| >   are to be used
| > - ENTRY could be used / or renamed for something more descriptive
| >   and being used aligned jmp targets or in case of procs with
| >   shared body
| > - PROC/ENDPROC are to replace old ENTRY/END for procs being called
| >   mostly from C code
| 
| So what prevents us from extending ENTRY/END instead of introducing
| another set?
| Let us try to extend what we have and not introduce something new.
| 
| 	Sam
| 

It could disable us to make such a conversion step-by-step I think.
Of course it would be better to just extend ENTRY/END (since already
there) and we could even restrict it to X86 only at the beginning
but even then we have to check all ENTRY/END that they are used properly
(ie like a procedure markers having @function attribute). Not sure
what would be better. And btw ENDPROC is more descriptive then plain END :)

		- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/