linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49494BFD.6000909@opengridcomputing.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:59:09 -0600
From:	Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
CC:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Max Kellermann <mk@...all.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gcosta@...hat.com, Grant Coady <grant_lkml@...o.com.au>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely
 fashion

Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 09:27 -0600, Tom Tucker wrote:
>>> +	if (!test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags))
>>> +		kernel_sock_shutdown(svsk->sk_sock, SHUT_RDWR);
>> How is this different than what happens as an artifact of sock_release?
> 
> The point is that it is independent of whether or not something is
> holding a reference to the svc_sock.

Thanks, makes sense.

> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/