[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1229548244.3384.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:10:44 -0500
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] fixing audit rule ordering mess, part 1
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 20:59 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:28:08PM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> > I don't see why prio is only important on AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT. Couldn't I
> > end up with stupidity with entry,never ?
>
>
> AUDIT_WATCH and AUDIT_INODE can live only on exit chain. I.e. we don't have
> that problem - other chains sit on the lists of their own and there the
> list ordering itself takes care of everything. Exit chain has parts in
> sitting in hash instead of the primary list.
Makes perfect sense. They all look good to me.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists