[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081217140318.c6832440.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:03:18 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: menage@...gle.com
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] CGroups: Hierarchy locking/refcount changes
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:30:55 -0800
menage@...gle.com wrote:
> These patches introduce new locking/refcount support for cgroups to
> reduce the need for subsystems to call cgroup_lock(). This will
> ultimately allow the atomicity of cgroup_rmdir() (which was removed
> recently) to be restored.
OK, they merged OK. We're accumulating rather a lot of cgroups work.
I have a question mark over these:
cgroups-make-root_list-contains-active-hierarchies-only.patch
cgroups-add-inactive-subsystems-to-rootnodesubsys_list.patch
cgroups-add-inactive-subsystems-to-rootnodesubsys_list-fix.patch
cgroups-introduce-link_css_set-to-remove-duplicate-code.patch
cgroups-introduce-link_css_set-to-remove-duplicate-code-fix.patch
it wasn't clear to me whether you still had issues with them, or
whether updates were expected?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists