[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4949831B.2000809@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:54:19 -0800
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
Rusty Russell wrote:
> Like cpu_coregroup_map, but returns a (const) pointer.
>
> (This will go to Ingo separately as part of the x86 series, just
> airing it here for thoroughness).
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
I've pulled this patch into the queue for my cpus4096-for-ingo tree.
[PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
I can also line up a queue for sched related changes:
[PATCH 4/4] cpumask: Replace cpu_coregroup_map with cpu_coregroup_map()
Is there any status on the corresponding changes for sparc, s390? (I assume
that they'll need to be merged into linux-next?)
[PATCH 2/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): sparc
[PATCH 3/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): s390
Thanks,
Mike
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff -r 11a884ebd99b arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h Thu Nov 20 13:54:24 2008 +1030
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h Thu Nov 20 13:55:44 2008 +1030
> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@
> #endif
>
> extern cpumask_t cpu_coregroup_map(int cpu);
> +extern const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu);
>
> #ifdef ENABLE_TOPO_DEFINES
> #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).phys_proc_id)
> diff -r 11a884ebd99b arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c Thu Nov 20 13:54:24 2008 +1030
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c Thu Nov 20 13:55:44 2008 +1030
> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@
> }
>
> /* maps the cpu to the sched domain representing multi-core */
> -cpumask_t cpu_coregroup_map(int cpu)
> +const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> {
> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> /*
> @@ -505,9 +505,14 @@
> * And for power savings, we return cpu_core_map
> */
> if (sched_mc_power_savings || sched_smt_power_savings)
> - return per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu);
> + return &per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu);
> else
> - return c->llc_shared_map;
> + return &c->llc_shared_map;
> +}
> +
> +cpumask_t cpu_coregroup_map(int cpu)
> +{
> + return *cpu_coregroup_mask(cpu);
> }
>
> static void impress_friends(void)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists