[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081218103459.GD10513@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:34:59 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/function-graph-tracer: prevent from hrtimer
interrupt infinite loop
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Impact: fix a system hang on slow systems
>
> While testing the function graph tracer on VirtualBox, I had a system hang
> immediatly after enabling the tracer.
>
> If hrtimer is enabled on kernel, a slow system can spend too much time
> during tracing the hrtimer_interrupt which will do eternal loops,
> assuming it always have to retry its process because too much time
> elapsed during its time update. Now we provide a feature which lurks at
> the number of retries on hrtimer_interrupt. After 10 retries, the
> function graph tracer will definetly stop its tracing.
hm, i dont really like this solution - it just works around the problem by
'speeding up' the system. If we have a _real_ slow system, there's no such
way for us to speed it up.
Thomas, what do you think - would you expect this lockup to happen on
really slow systems? If yes, is there a way we could avoid it from
happening - by driving some sort of 'mandatory interval', that is doubled
in size every time we detect such a bad hrtimer loop?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists