linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: process.c declare c1e_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081218123613.GE25715@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:36:13 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: process.c declare c1e_remove_cpu before they get
	used


* Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org> wrote:

> Impact: cleanup
> 
> Included asm/idle.h for c1e_remove_cpu declaration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index f50f8bf..25313de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/ftrace.h>
>  #include <asm/system.h>
>  #include <asm/apic.h>
> +#include <asm/idle.h>
>  
>  unsigned long idle_halt;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(idle_halt);

hm, why is this needed? Have you seen a compiler warning?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/