linux-kernel - Re: [refpolicy] ath9k capability=16 won't compile into policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <494A7E0D.6050200@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:45:01 -0500
From:	Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>
To:	Justin Mattock <justinmattock@...il.com>
CC:	SE-Linux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	tresys <refpolicy@....tresys.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [refpolicy] ath9k capability=16 won't compile into policy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Justin Mattock wrote:
> I'm not too sure if I should post this with SELinux,
> refpolicy, or kernel.org,(or even wpasupplicant);
>  so I decided to do all to the best of my knowledge.
> when using the ath9k module with the latest git
> kernel(or atleast a few days old); and the latest refpolicy (svn)
> I'm seeing this avc denial show up:
> 
> Dec 16 12:33:32 name kernel: [   20.415785] type=1400
> audit(1229459612.411:3): avc:  denied  { sys_module } for  pid=2510
> comm="wpa_supplicant" capability=16
> scontext=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0
> tcontext=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0 tclass=capability
> Dec 16 12:33:32 name kernel: [   20.428494] type=1300
> audit(1229459612.411:3): arch=40000003 syscall=54 success=no exit=-19
> a0=9 a1=8933 a2=bfadd94c a3=bfadd94c items=0 ppid=1 pid=2510
> auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0
> fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="wpa_supplicant"
> exe="/sbin/wpa_supplicant" subj=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0
> key=(null)
> 
> the allow rule is:(with ath9k module)
> allow system_dbusd_t self:capability sys_module;
> which in turn will be rejected by checkpolicy
> (capability 16)
> when compiling the policy.
> 
> If I use the madwifi module the avc is similar but produces
> allow system_dbusd_t self:capability { sys_admin }
> (capability 12)
> and will be accepted by checkpolicy.
> 
> As for setup I'm using NetworkManager from
> intrepid as well as wpasupplicant
> 
> Any info would be appreciated so I can test this module out
> and feel better knowing the module is not being denied in any
> way, that might cause a false positive, or some other weirdness.
> 
> 
> regards;
We label wpa_supplicant as NetworkManager_exec_t and have dbus
transition to this domain.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAklKfg0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobPltQCfbcRlboJohHcUaUaASFMbj1LK
/9AAoNPuDJuPv3B4tpikLzsjUPYCUe4I
=Nozo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/