linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (fscache)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081218092557.b274e9dd.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:25:57 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, dhowells@...hat.com
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (fscache)

On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:06:37 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20081217:
> 
> New tree:
> 	fscache


When CONFIG_BLOCK=n:

build-r7417.out:/local/linsrc/linux-next-20081218/fs/cachefiles/cf-interface.c:357: error: implicit declaration of function 'fsync_super'
build-r7417.out:make[3]: *** [fs/cachefiles/cf-interface.o] Error 1


Should include/linux/buffer_head.h have an empty stub for fsync_super()
or does fscache even make sense when CONFIG_BLOCK=n?

---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/