| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:25:57 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, dhowells@...hat.com Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (fscache) On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:06:37 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20081217: > > New tree: > fscache When CONFIG_BLOCK=n: build-r7417.out:/local/linsrc/linux-next-20081218/fs/cachefiles/cf-interface.c:357: error: implicit declaration of function 'fsync_super' build-r7417.out:make[3]: *** [fs/cachefiles/cf-interface.o] Error 1 Should include/linux/buffer_head.h have an empty stub for fsync_super() or does fscache even make sense when CONFIG_BLOCK=n? --- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists