[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081218181210.GG26572@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:42:10 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Collier-Brown <davecb@....com>,
Tim Connors <tconnors@...ro.swin.edu.au>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu
* Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2008-12-18 23:26:22]:
> When the system utilisation is low and more cpus are idle,
> then the process waking up from sleep should prefer to
> wakeup an idle cpu from semi-idle cpu package (multi core
> package) rather than a completely idle cpu package which
> would waste power.
>
> Use the sched_mc balance logic in find_busiest_group() to
> nominate a preferred wakeup cpu.
>
> This info can be sored in appropriate sched_domain, but
> updating this info in all copies of sched_domain is not
> practical. Hence this information is stored in root_domain
> struct which is one copy per partitioned sched domain.
> The root_domain can be accessed from each cpu's runqueue
> and there is one copy per partitioned sched domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> kernel/sched.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 0b9bbbd..3415fa3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -493,6 +493,14 @@ struct root_domain {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> struct cpupri cpupri;
> #endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
> + /*
> + * Preferred wake up cpu nominated by sched_mc balance that will be
> + * used when most cpus are idle in the system indicating overall very
> + * low system utilisation. Triggered at POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP(2)
> + */
> + unsigned int sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu;
> +#endif
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -3407,6 +3415,10 @@ out_balanced:
>
> if (this == group_leader && group_leader != group_min) {
> *imbalance = min_load_per_task;
> + if (sched_mc_power_savings >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP) {
> + cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu =
> + first_cpu(group_leader->cpumask);
> + }
> return group_min;
> }
> #endif
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists