lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200812190039.34184.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:39:33 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>, dsaxena@...xity.net,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TSC not updating after resume: Bug or Feature?

On Thursday, 18 of December 2008, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 23:19 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 18 of December 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Rafael, would something like this explain why we had to revert Shaggy's 
> > > > patch?
> > 
> > Well, I have yet to understand what the suspend-resume of the timekeeping code
> > actually does.
> > 
> > The original description sounds worrisome to me, it looks like we've overlooked
> > something at least.
> > 
> > > > His patch fixes the backward motion filter and I'm at an utter  
> > > > loss why that would break suspend.
> > > 
> > > yes, i'd love to have this commit reinstated:
> > > 
> > >  5b7dba4: sched_clock: prevent scd->clock from moving backwards
> > > 
> > > and the bug triggered by hibernation fixed instead.
> > 
> > Shaggy said he had an idea of what was wrong, so I expect an updated version
> > of the patch to appear.
> 
> Not really.  I said I'd look at it, but all I know is that it looks like
> something clock-related isn't initialized correctly after resume.  I
> don't know enough to have any idea how to fix it.

Well, thanks for the update.

I'm going to have a look at the thing tomorrow, but I'm not sure I'll be able
to fix it.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ