[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200812181644.00796.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:44:00 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
On Thursday 18 December 2008 09:24:19 Mike Travis wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Like cpu_coregroup_map, but returns a (const) pointer.
> >
> > (This will go to Ingo separately as part of the x86 series, just
> > airing it here for thoroughness).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>
> I've pulled this patch into the queue for my cpus4096-for-ingo tree.
>
> [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
>
> I can also line up a queue for sched related changes:
>
> [PATCH 4/4] cpumask: Replace cpu_coregroup_map with cpu_coregroup_map()
>
> Is there any status on the corresponding changes for sparc, s390? (I assume
> that they'll need to be merged into linux-next?)
>
> [PATCH 2/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): sparc
> [PATCH 3/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): s390
You can't take 4/4 until 2/4 and 3/4 are merged, and since it's not
x86-specific as well, we'll leave it in my tree.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists