[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081219090856.48666b14@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:08:56 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, bluebird@...too.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-2.6.28 final] byteorder: fix new headers for userspace
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:47:28 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > I think it would be better to just make it a config option, call it
> > CONFIG_[LITTLE|BIG]_ENDIAN and set it up in the architecture
> > Kconfig file. I think some of the people who can set it dynamically
> > (or where it depends on the target machine) already effectively do
> > that.
>
> Never mind, since we end up having to export it to user space (do
> we?) we can't depend on the config.h file, nor can we pollute the
> name space.
>
why are we exposing byte order functions to userspace in the first
place ????
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists