linux-kernel - Re: Intel x86_64 llc_shared_map/cpu_llc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:15:17 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>, hpa@...or.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Intel x86_64 llc_shared_map/cpu_llc_id anomolies


* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:

> > Is cpu_llc_id supposed to be unique across blades?  I assume 
> > llc_shared_map should not be showing shared cache across blades.
> 
> x86 folks, Appended patch fixes the reported issue. Please apply.

applied, thanks Suresh!

Not for v2.6.28 because that is going to be released in a few days and 
these sorts of changes can easily cause boot regressions - but i marked it 
for -stable backport so it will hit .28.1 if everything is fine.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/