[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081219081835.GA9097@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:18:35 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: beckyb@...nel.crashing.org, jeremy@...p.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
x86@...nel.org, ian.campbell@...rix.com, jbeulich@...ell.com,
joerg.roedel@....com, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 14] swiotlb/x86: lay groundwork for xen dom0 use
of swiotlb
* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:17:54 -0600
> Becky Bruce <beckyb@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> > > Can you be more specific? What architecture is plan to use highmem
> > > support in swiotlb?
> >
> > 32-bit powerpc needs this support - I was actually about to push a
> > similar set of patches. We have several processors that support 36
> > bits of physical address space and do not have any iommu capability.
> > The rest of the kernel support for those processors is now in place,
> > so swiotlb is the last piece of the puzzle for that to be fully
> > functional. I need to take a closer look at this series to see
> > exactly what it's doing and how it differs from what I've been testing.
>
> Ah, thanks,
>
> Then I accept that highmem support in lib/swiotbl.c is generically
> useful and we have to live with the ugly complication due to it.
Great! And we of course want to make the best possible job here - so
whenever you notice any area that could be done better and less
intrusively, please mention it.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists