linux-kernel - Re: [RFC]: Support for zero-copy TCP transmit of user space data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <494BDBC5.7050701@vlnb.net>
Date:	Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:37:09 +0300
From:	Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
To:	"David M. Lloyd" <dmlloyd@...rg.com>
CC:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC]: Support for zero-copy TCP transmit of user space data

David M. Lloyd, on 12/18/2008 09:43 PM wrote:
> On 12/18/2008 12:35 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>> An iSCSI target driver iSCSI-SCST was a part of the patchset 
>> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/10/293). For it a nice optimization to 
>> have TCP zero-copy transmit of user space data was implemented. Patch, 
>> implementing this optimization was also sent in the patchset, see 
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/10/296.
> 
> I'm probably ignorant of about 90% of the context here, but isn't this the 
> sort of problem that was supposed to have been solved by vmsplice(2)?

No, vmsplice can't help here. ISCSI-SCST is a kernel space driver. But, 
even if it was a user space driver, vmsplice wouldn't change anything 
much. It doesn't have a possibility for a user to know, when 
transmission of the data finished. So, it is intended to be used as: 
vmsplice() buffer -> munmap() the buffer -> mmap() new buffer -> 
vmsplice() it. But on the mmap() stage kernel has to zero all the newly 
mapped pages and zeroing memory isn't much faster, than copying it. 
Hence, there would be no considerable performance increase.

Thanks,
Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/