[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1229723644-13630-45-git-send-email-mfasheh@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:54:03 -0800
From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>,
Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 44/45] ocfs2/xattr: Fix a bug in xattr allocation estimation
From: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
When we extend one xattr's value to a large size, the old value size might
be smaller than the size of a value root. In those cases, we still need to
guess the metadata allocation.
Reported-by: Tiger Yang <tiger.yang@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
index 8af29b3..d0b94ed 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
@@ -2270,6 +2270,7 @@ static int ocfs2_calc_xattr_set_need(struct inode *inode,
value_size);
xv = (struct ocfs2_xattr_value_root *)
(base + name_offset + name_len);
+ value_size = OCFS2_XATTR_ROOT_SIZE;
} else
xv = &def_xv.xv;
@@ -2283,7 +2284,8 @@ static int ocfs2_calc_xattr_set_need(struct inode *inode,
&xv->xr_list,
new_clusters -
old_clusters);
- goto out;
+ if (value_size >= OCFS2_XATTR_ROOT_SIZE)
+ goto out;
}
} else {
/*
--
1.5.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists