[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081219114808C.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:47:42 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: beckyb@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, jeremy@...p.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
x86@...nel.org, ian.campbell@...rix.com, jbeulich@...ell.com,
joerg.roedel@....com, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 14] swiotlb/x86: lay groundwork for xen dom0 use
of swiotlb
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:17:54 -0600
Becky Bruce <beckyb@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > Can you be more specific? What architecture is plan to use highmem
> > support in swiotlb?
>
> 32-bit powerpc needs this support - I was actually about to push a
> similar set of patches. We have several processors that support 36
> bits of physical address space and do not have any iommu capability.
> The rest of the kernel support for those processors is now in place,
> so swiotlb is the last piece of the puzzle for that to be fully
> functional. I need to take a closer look at this series to see
> exactly what it's doing and how it differs from what I've been testing.
Ah, thanks,
Then I accept that highmem support in lib/swiotbl.c is generically
useful and we have to live with the ugly complication due to it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists