linux-kernel - Re: device driver probe return codes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:14:36 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: device driver probe return codes

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:41:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:53:31 +0000 Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org> wrote:
> 
> > I would like some feedback on the following regarding some
> > form of standardising return codes from a device driver probe
> > to try and stop some basic mistakes.
> > 
> > This document is not complete, any additions would be welcone.

Hm, shouldn't you have at least copied me on this?

What is this for?  Each of the different busses treat return codes for
their probe functions a bit differently, are you wanting to unify them?
And if so, why?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/