[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812192041090.29275@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:41:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] cpumask: convert kernel trace functions
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Mike Travis wrote:
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Mike Travis wrote:
> >
> >> Impact: Reduce memory usage, use new cpumask API.
> >>
> >> Convert kernel trace functions to use struct cpumask.
> >>
> > How does this save memory if we just allocate a cpumask var everytime
> > we allocate a ring buffer? Is cpumask_var_t a mask of possible CPUS and
> > not NR_CPUS?
> >
> > Otherwise, I see this as just adding one extra pointer.
> >
> > -- Steve
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> Yes, eventually, the cpumask_var_t will be allocated based on cpumask_size()
> which will become BITS_TO_LONG(nr_cpu_ids) instead of BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS)
> as soon as the kernel becomes "cpumask" clean. (clean being that it ignores
> all bits >= nr_cpu_ids.)
>
> Note that on small NR_CPUS count systems, cpumask_var_t is a static array
> and no allocation happens, so it only kicks in when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y.
For future memory savings...
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists