lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a36005b50812192037g1380a997ycc87f600db18af0c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:37:29 -0800
From:	"Ulrich Drepper" <drepper@...il.com>
To:	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: st_mode bits

What is the future of the bits beyond bit 15 in st_mode?  Currently
only 16 bits are used.  There are old struct stat formats which have
only 16 bit st_mode fields.  Is this the limiting factor?

I ask because I want to use one bit in glibc.  If the future of the
kernel calls for more than 16 bits in st_mode, can we agree on a bit
(perhaps bit 31) to be reserved for userlevel?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ