linux-kernel - processor isolation inquiry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <494E586C.7070107@cfl.rr.com>
Date:	Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:53:32 -0500
From:	Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@....rr.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel-rt <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Subject: processor isolation inquiry

It's been some time now since Max K. brought up the complete processor isolation
discussion. I know his original patch was NAK'd but some work on this was put
into cpusets. I'm unclear as to what actually has been or will be implemented.

The 2 things I'm most interested in are work queues, and local timer interrupts.
Is it yet possible to isolate a processor from either of these 2 things with
recent kernels?

The kernel doc concerning cpusets doesn't seem to clarify this for me.

The Process shielding instructions at

http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/CPU_shielding_using_/proc_and_/dev/cpuset

don't seem to help with work queues or local timer interrupts. Should they?

Thanks in advance for any pointers
Mark

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/