| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:13:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v5] SGI RTC: add clocksource driver
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> +
> +int cpu_to_pnode(int cpu)
> +{
> + return uv_apicid_to_pnode(per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu));
> +}
static please
> +/*
> + * Hardware interface routines
> + */
> +
> +/* Send IPIs to another node */
> +static void
> +uv_rtc_send_IPI(int cpu, int vector)
One line, except the line exceeds 80 chars. All over the place.
> +{
> + unsigned long val, apicid, lapicid;
> + int pnode;
> +
> + apicid = per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu);
> + lapicid = apicid & 0x3f;
> + pnode = uv_apicid_to_pnode(apicid);
> +
> + val = (1UL << UVH_IPI_INT_SEND_SHFT) | (lapicid <<
> + UVH_IPI_INT_APIC_ID_SHFT) |
> + (vector << UVH_IPI_INT_VECTOR_SHFT);
This is horrible to read.
+ val = (1UL << UVH_IPI_INT_SEND_SHFT) |
+ (lapicid << UVH_IPI_INT_APIC_ID_SHFT) |
+ (vector << UVH_IPI_INT_VECTOR_SHFT);
Takes the same amount of lines, but is parseable.
> + uv_write_global_mmr64(pnode, UVH_IPI_INT, val);
> +}
> +
> +/* Check for an RTC interrupt pending */
> +static int
> +uv_intr_pending(int pnode)
> +{
> + if (uv_read_global_mmr64(pnode, UVH_EVENT_OCCURRED0) &
> + UVH_EVENT_OCCURRED0_RTC1_MASK)
> + return 1;
> + else
> + return 0;
return uv_read_global_mmr64(pnode, UVH_EVENT_OCCURRED0) &
UVH_EVENT_OCCURRED0_RTC1_MASK;
> +
> +/* Allocate per-node list of cpu timer expiration times. */
> +static int
> +uv_rtc_allocate_timers(void)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> + int max = 0;
> + int pnode = -1;
> + int i = 0;
Please collapse those ints into one line
> + struct uv_rtc_timer_head *head = NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Determine max possible hyperthreads/pnode for allocation.
> + *
> + * Allocate for all cpus that could come up, although we don't
> + * fully support hotplug (yet).
> + */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (pnode != cpu_to_pnode(cpu)) {
> + i = 0;
> + pnode = cpu_to_pnode(cpu);
> + }
> + if (max < ++i)
> + max = i;
> + }
Is this worth the trouble whether we allocate a couple of u64s per
node or not ?
Also isn't this kind of topology evaluation not done in x86 code
already ?
> + pnode = -1;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (pnode != cpu_to_pnode(cpu)) {
> + i = 0;
> + pnode = cpu_to_pnode(cpu);
> + head = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct uv_rtc_timer_head) +
> + (max * sizeof(u64)),
> + GFP_KERNEL, pnode);
> + if (!head)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Leaks memory for already allocated nodes
> + spin_lock_init(&head->lock);
> + head->fcpu = cpu;
> + head->cpus = 0;
> + head->next_cpu = -1;
> + }
> + head->cpus++;
> + head->expires[i++] = ULLONG_MAX;
> + per_cpu(rtc_timer_head, cpu) = head;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Find and set the next expiring timer. */
> +static void
> +uv_rtc_find_next_timer(struct uv_rtc_timer_head *head, int pnode)
> +{
> + u64 exp;
> + u64 lowest = ULLONG_MAX;
> + int cpu = -1;
> + int c;
u64 exp, lowest = ULLONG_MAX;
int c, cpu = -1;
please
> + head->next_cpu = -1;
> + for (c = 0; c < head->cpus; c++) {
> + exp = head->expires[c];
> + if (exp < lowest) {
> + cpu = c;
> + lowest = exp;
> + }
> + }
How many cpus do we iterate here ? Is this really scaling ?
> + if (cpu >= 0) {
> + head->next_cpu = cpu;
> + c = head->fcpu + cpu;
> + uv_setup_intr(c, lowest);
> + /* If we didn't set it up in time, trigger */
> + if (lowest < uv_read_rtc() && !uv_intr_pending(pnode))
> + uv_rtc_send_IPI(c, GENERIC_TIMER_VECTOR);
Please move the expired check into uv_setup_intr() and return the
expired status. You need the same check in uv_rtc_set_timer() below.
> +/*
> + * Local APIC timer broadcast function
> + */
> +static void
> +uv_rtc_timer_broadcast(cpumask_t mask)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> + for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask)
> + uv_rtc_send_IPI(cpu, GENERIC_TIMER_VECTOR);
> +}
No need to implement broadcast. Your clock event device is not
affected from power states or such, so this will never be called.
> +static void
> +uv_rtc_interrupt(void)
> +{
> + struct clock_event_device *ced = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_ced);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
called with interrupts disabled already.
> + if (!ced || !ced->event_handler || !uv_rtc_unset_timer(cpu)) {
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + "Spurious uv_rtc timer interrupt on cpu %d\n", cpu);
> + return;
> + }
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + ced->event_handler(ced);
> +}
> +
> +static __init void
> +uv_rtc_register_clockevents(void *data)
> +{
> + struct clock_event_device *ced = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_ced);
> +
> + *ced = clock_event_device_uv;
> + cpus_clear(ced->cpumask);
> + cpu_set(smp_processor_id(), ced->cpumask);
> + clockevents_register_device(ced);
clockevents_register_device can not be called from interrupt
context. You use an SMP call for this. Please test your code with
lockdep enabled.
> +}
> +
> +static __init int
> +uv_rtc_setup_clock(void)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (!is_uv_system() ||
> + register_generic_timer_extension(uv_rtc_interrupt))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + clocksource_uv.mult = clocksource_hz2mult(sn_rtc_cycles_per_second,
> + clocksource_uv.shift);
> +
> + rc = clocksource_register(&clocksource_uv);
> + if (rc) {
> + unregister_generic_timer_extension();
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + /* Setup and register clockevents */
> + rc = uv_rtc_allocate_timers();
> + if (rc) {
The clock source is already registered. So now the module is removed
and the timekeeping code explodes.
clocksource_unregister(...) perpaps?
> + unregister_generic_timer_extension();
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + clock_event_device_uv.mult = div_sc(sn_rtc_cycles_per_second,
> + NSEC_PER_SEC, clock_event_device_uv.shift);
> +
> + clock_event_device_uv.min_delta_ns = NSEC_PER_SEC /
> + sn_rtc_cycles_per_second;
> + clock_event_device_uv.max_delta_ns = clocksource_uv.mask *
> + (NSEC_PER_SEC / sn_rtc_cycles_per_second);
> +
> + on_each_cpu(uv_rtc_register_clockevents, NULL, 0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +module_init(uv_rtc_setup_clock);
> Index: linux/kernel/time/clockevents.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/time/clockevents.c 2008-12-19 10:02:23.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux/kernel/time/clockevents.c 2008-12-19 10:02:36.000000000 -0600
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ void clockevents_register_device(struct
>
> spin_unlock(&clockevents_lock);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clockevents_register_device);
Separate patch please
> /*
> * Noop handler when we shut down an event device
> Index: linux/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/time/clocksource.c 2008-12-19 10:02:23.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux/kernel/time/clocksource.c 2008-12-19 10:02:36.000000000 -0600
> @@ -369,6 +369,7 @@ void clocksource_unregister(struct clock
> next_clocksource = select_clocksource();
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clocksource_lock, flags);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(clocksource_unregister);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL and separate patch please.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists