[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200812202332.36281.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:32:35 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vernon Sauder <vernoninhand@...il.com>
Subject: [patch 2.6.28-rc9] spi: spi_write_then_read() regression fix
From: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
The recent "simplify spi_write_then_read()" patch included a small
regression from the 2.6.27 behavior with its performance win.
All SPI transfers are full duplex, and are packaged as half duplex
by either discarding the data that's read ("write only"), or else
by writing zeroes ("read only"). That patch wasn't ensuring that
zeroes were getting written out during the "half duplex read" part
of the transaction; instead, old RX bits were getting sent.
The fix is trivial: zero the buffer before using it.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Vernon Sauder <vernoninhand@...il.com>
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -677,11 +677,13 @@ int spi_write_then_read(struct spi_device *spi,
/* ... unless someone else is using the pre-allocated buffer */
if (!mutex_trylock(&lock)) {
- local_buf = kmalloc(SPI_BUFSIZ, GFP_KERNEL);
+ local_buf = kzalloc(SPI_BUFSIZ, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!local_buf)
return -ENOMEM;
- } else
+ } else {
local_buf = buf;
+ memset(local_buf, 0, x.len);
+ }
memcpy(local_buf, txbuf, n_tx);
x.tx_buf = local_buf;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists