| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:55:20 +0100 From: "Tim Blechmann" <tim@...ngt.org> To: "Robert Richter" <robert.richter@....com> Cc: "Tim Blechmann" <tim@...ngt.org>, oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression >>> i am experiencing an issue, similar to the one reported in >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/30/319. >> >> bisecting showed, that commit b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8 >> (oprofile: Implement Intel architectural perfmon support) caused the >> problem. >> oddly, the newly introduced api is not used, since the model struct is >> set during the ppro_init call ... > > Tim, > > I just tested rc9 on a system I have available and I could not > reproduce this. > > cpu family : 6 > model : 15 > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz > stepping : 2 > > Does fix 7c64ade53a6f977d73f16243865c42ceae999aea work on your system? 7c64ade53a6f977d73f16243865c42ceae999aea has been included in rc9, but still i experience this issue ... the only difference to my cpu is the stepping (i have stepping 6) ... also, in case it matters, i am running a 64bit kernel ... tim --------------------------------------------------------------- diese nachricht wurde ueber klingt.org gesendet this message was sent through klingt.org's webmail. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists