[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4951432F.3050701@ct.jp.nec.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:59:43 -0800
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC -tip 2/4] x86: uaccess: introduce __{get|put}_user exception
handling framework
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
>>
>> Impact: introduce new framework
>>
>> Introduce exception handling framework.
>> __{get|put}_user_ex_try() begins exception block and
>> __{get|put}_user_ex_catch() ends block and if an exception occurred in this
>> block using __{get|put}_user_ex, direct jump to __{get|put}_user_ex_catch()
>> and err is set to specified value.
>
> ha, this tickled ~12 year old memories: back then Linus came up with a
> very, very similar scheme, for user-copy exception handling.
>
> Such a scheme would be elegant, creates more compact code (we can use
> conditional results directly in branch instructions instead of having to
> export them into registers), and it makes sense syntactically, but it
> doesnt work: GCC is free to reorder (or eliminate) basic blocks and these
> labels can lose their relationship.
>
> So this cannot be done via inline assembly right now, it needs some
> compiler help. Sniff :)
thanks for the above explanation.
I felt it's very hard to understand GCC.
Thanks,
Hiroshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists