[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081223220343.GA27098@plexity.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:03:43 +0000
From: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...xity.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TSC not updating after resume: Bug or Feature?
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:19:12PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > of cycles (~2000 ftrace entries). From following the ftrace, what is
> > happening is that the clocksource is not updated until we run the cpu_idle()
> > thread due to an explicit scheduling operation in the resume path that occurs
> > via call to msleep from pci_set_power_state(). As I'm still fully groking the
> > timekeeping code, the question(s) I have is whether this is expected behaviour
> > and I should not assume valid timestamp data in the initial bits of the suspend path,
> > whether this is an OLPC-specific bug, or whether I've uncovered a generic bug in
> > the timekeeping implementation. This is on 2.6.27.7 as I've not gotten 28-rc
> > up and running on the XO but can move that up in priority if this behaviour
> > is different in newer kernels.
>
> Can you please upload the full trace somewhere ?
>
> Thanks,
Thomas,
Sorry for the delayed response...travelling and have very limited
connectivity. I will read the thread in detail when back online in a
few days.
http://dev.laptop.org/~dsaxena/suspend-trace-1267
~Deepak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists