[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1230032601.9487.247.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:43:21 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu_counter: use local_t and atomic_long_t if
possible
One think that sprung to mind,..
IFF we're going to implement percpu_counter with local_t and make
local_t this funny tri-counter thing which has its own error, you need
to fix up bdi_stat_error() - it expects to be an upper bound for the
counter error, getting that wrong _will_ cause deadlocks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists